A wise woman said to me yesterday, "Don't mistake someone's emotional response to your work as a note."
Wow. If a reader is frustrated with the main character because the character is acting in a frustrating way, isn't that what you wanted to do, as an author? Wasn't the intention to get the reader to FEEL something?
Whenever I watch Michael in "The Office" I physically FEEL humiliated, embarrassed and mortified by and for him. Sometimes, I actually look away from the screen, or bury my face in my hands. Other times, I laugh, because, what other response is there?! Yet, I love this show. Love it!
Yes, Mary (the heroine in my book) is young, and naive, and passive and is not in control of her own life. I can see wholeheartedly why that is so frustrating. But, that's my point!!
In Kate Chopin's "The Awakening" Edna destroys her life. Destroys it! She destroys her marriage, her children, her friendships, her reputation...everything! All this in an attempt to find an autonomy that did not exist for women of that time period! All this destruction while she fantasizes about a young man whom she thinks she's fallen in love with, and when she is so ruined even HE won't have anything to with her, she swims out to the middle of the ocean and drowns. Stupid woman!! Stupid, stupid, woman!! It's my favorite book of all time.
The real question is, do you like her enough to keep reading?
Or him?
When Frank McCourt was starving to death in Ireland because he was so poor, a circumstance completely out of his control because of his age and location, you, the reader, keep reading because you want to see how he gets out of that mess.
Same thing here, with Mary.
One reader said, after reading my book, "I just couldn't put it down, because I couldn't see how she was going to get through it."
Do not confuse emotional responses as notes.
Sometimes, whether the reader knows it or not, it's a validation of everything you tried to accomplish.